UNB Home

PROJECTS > cOMPLETED

Factors Affecting Surgical Orthopaedic Patients’ Post-Discharge Recovery

L.L. Ouellet, RN MN & M.J. Hodgins, RN PhD (Co-Principle Investigators)
S. Pond, RN BN; S. Knorr, RN BN & G. Geldart, RN MHSA (Co-Investigators)

Study Purpose:

The primary purposes of this study were to examine the type, frequency and severity of problems reported by surgical orthopaedic patients following hospital discharge and to determine the effectiveness of a post-discharge telephone call in facilitating patients’ continued recovery during the transition from hospital to home.

Method:

The sample consisted of patients admitted to a regional, referral hospital for either elective or emergency orthopaedic surgery. Selection criteria included: (a) English-speaking adults, (b) able to communicate by telephone, and (c) discharged to a private residence with telephone access. Eligible patients were recruited during their hospital stay. Participants were randomly assigned to receive routine discharge care with/without a follow-up telephone call 24 to 72 hours post-discharge. During the third week post-discharge, a structured telephone interview was completed. Questions addressed various aspects of participants’ physical, psychological, and social recovery.

Results:

Information was collected from 438 participants (half of whom had received a follow-up telephone call). The typical participant was a middle-aged (Mean 59 years, Range 17 to 86), educated (63% high school diploma or higher) female (55%) who underwent elective surgery (78%). Majority of surgeries involved the lower extremity (81%). Most participants rated their progress following discharge as good (Mean 8 on a 11-point numerical scale) and were satisfied with their progress (94%). Despite this, many (71%) experienced problems following discharge that interfered with their recovery.

Study findings highlight the frequency and diversity of problems experienced by surgical orthopaedic patients post-discharge. The most frequently reported problems were pain, swelling, and constipation. Women and younger participants generally reported poorer post-discharge experiences which may be due in part to their social roles and responsibilities. Participants who underwent total knee or hip surgery tended to report fewer post-discharge problems. The nurse clinicians on our team attributed this finding to the formalized care plans used with these patients. Contrary to our expectations, distance from hospital and season of discharge did not explain differences in participants’ post-discharge experiences. Overall, the most significant predictor of positive post-discharge experience was the availability of adequate support at home. This finding warrants consideration especially when dealing with older patients whose primary source of help may be a spouse who may also have health problems. We were disappointed to discover that the telephone follow-up call did not appear to affect participants’ post-discharge experience. It is possible that these follow-up calls were too early or too short (majority were completed on the day following discharge and lasted less than 5 minutes).

Implications:

Although the majority of participants reported good progress since their discharge, they also reported a number of problems. One way to address this is by broadening the scope of care plans so that they include the early post-discharge phase. Further research is needed to identify and test other factors that may impact on patients’ transition from hospital to home.